by Michael Davidson The
most effective boards are those whose members are willing
to commit their time, energy and resources to the mission
of the organization. When we think about board effectiveness
we tend to focus on outcomes such as clear oversight,
fundraising, productive committees, etc. It is important
however to look at the dynamics which motivate energized
and committed board members.
- Self fulfilling
prophesies.
The Executive Director has a critical role in creating
the environment in which the board operates. An Executive
Director who regards the board as an impediment to their
management, or, as I have heard, “more trouble than
they are worth”, is playing a large part in creating
boards that are just that.
Dealing with a board as if it were
a dragon we don’t want to disturb can turn it into
just that. Is it really a dragon, or is it a large
puppy that would love nothing more than to be engaged?
The Executive Director, on the other
hand, who regards the board as sincere supporters
of the mission with great potential to help, has gone
a long way towards helping them to be, “part of the
solution, not part of the problem”
- Participation
on a board best meets the needs of both the organization
and the board members when it provides opportunities
to meet the members’ needs for:
- Meaningful
work and engagement
- Community
and affiliation
- Mastery
Volunteers join
boards because:
- The mission
of the organization is meaningful to them
- They want
to help achieve that mission in community with others.
- They want
to use their skills to advance that mission and
to have an opportunity to develop new leadership
skills.
When board participation
does not satisfy these needs, board members tend to
withdraw or to engage in activities that are not productive
or which are driven by their own agendas, e.g., second
guessing the Executive Director, “helping” staff to
do their jobs better, using their board position to
advance personal goals, etc.
Boards that work best are those that demand the
most from their members, not the least!
How is this done?
- Obtaining
board agreement on the expectations of board membership.
Every board member must serve actively on at least
one committee or task force or take on an individual
assignment.
- Assigning
committees and task forces important work with specific
deliverables.
- Defining a
specific role/responsibility for each board member
- Creating a
mechanism to monitor committee progress.
- Establishing
a process to evaluate board members and the functioning
of the board as a whole.
While there is
no single “right” way for a board to function, the
board can discover ways that are best for this board
and this organization. So long as the focus is on
finding ways to fulfill its governance and support
responsibilities, there can be a continuing evolution
of board priorities and of systems for board organization.
- The spirit
must be attended to.
While the board has a special role
to play in a nonprofit organization, it is important
to remember that, at the end of the day, it is affected
and motivated by the same dynamics that influence
the performance of any group.
Board members will do their best work
when they are aware of how that work connects with
their values. Reflecting on work can be private, but
it can also be in conversation with others. When the
object of reflection is communal work towards shared
goals, reflection is best accomplished with that community.
Taking the time, as a board, to step
back and look at our work reinvigorates that work
by reconnecting it with personal values. It also strengthens
the connection with board colleagues, by allowing
them to see where they share values and by providing
an opportunity to appreciate where they differ.
This reflection can be accomplished
at a board meeting by setting aside a few minutes
for board members to evaluate the meeting, and more
intensively at an annual board retreat.
Michael
Davidson has over 20 years experience in Nonprofit Management
as a Board President, Manager, and Consultant. Michael is
also an Instructor at the Milano Graduate School of Nonprofit
Management and holds a variety of leadership positions in
associations dedicated to improving the effectiveness of
the nonprofit sector. He is a member of the Executive Committee
of the Alliance for Nonprofit Governance, the Steering Committee
of the New York Technical Assistance Providers Network,
and the Committee on Nonprofit Organizations of the Association
of the Bar of the City of New York.
|